IELTS 雅思 听力原创模拟题 2

A: Welcome to Greenwood Nature Reserve. I'm Tomas. How can I help you today? B: Hi Tomas, I'm calling to enquire about the weekend photography workshop. My name is Aisha Al-Mansoori. That's A-L, hyphen, M-A-N-S-O-O-R-I. A: Thanks Aisha. Let me just type your surname into our booking system: A-L, hyphen, M-A-N-S-O-O-R-I. Got it. Now, we have a couple of dates available. Are you looking at the one on the 14th of October? B: Actually, I have a family event that day. I'd like to book the one on the 28th of October instead. A: Perfect, October 28th. That's our Landscape Masterclass. It runs from 1:30 to 5:00 in the afternoon. We used to finish at 4:30, but we've extended the session to give people more time. B: That sounds great. What's the price for the session? A: The standard fee is 85 pounds, but we have a student discount which makes it 65 pounds. B: Excellent, I have a valid student card, so 65 pounds is perfect. Can I give you my phone number for the registration? It's 07700 900342. A: Let me read that back: 07700 900342. Got it. And please remember you'll need to bring a tripod. We provide other equipment like professional lenses, but everyone must bring their own tripod. B: I have one of those, so that's fine. Is any food provided during the afternoon? A: Since it's an afternoon session, lunch isn't included, but we do offer a free snack. You can choose either a fruit platter or a slice of chocolate cake. B: Chocolate cake, definitely! I can't resist that. A: Excellent choice. For the workshop, we'll meet at the Lakeside Cafe. Don't go to the Visitor Centre, as that's where the morning session gathers. Also, since we'll be doing long exposures of the waterfall, make sure you wear waterproof boots as the path gets very wet. And it's a good idea to wear a warm jacket because it gets quite cold by the water. Don't bring an umbrella, though, as it gets in the way of the camera gear. B: Got it. Waterproof boots and a warm jacket. No umbrella. Thanks so much for your help, Tomas! [Q1] Surname: ________

中文翻译

A：欢迎来到格林伍德自然保护区。我是托马斯。今天有什么可以帮您的吗？ B：你好，托马斯。我打电话是想咨询一下周末摄影工作坊的事。我叫艾莎·阿尔-曼苏里（Aisha Al-Mansoori）。拼写是 A-L，连字符，M-A-N-S-O-O-R-I。 A：谢谢你，艾莎。我把你的姓氏输入到我们的预订系统中：A-L，连字符，M-A-N-S-O-O-R-I。录入了。现在我们有几个日期可选。你想选10月14日的那个吗？ B：其实那天我有个家庭活动。我想改订10月28日的那个。 A：好的，10月28日。那是我们的风光大师班。时间是下午1:30到5:00。我们以前是4:30结束，但现在延长了时间，好让大家有更充裕的时间。 B：听起来太棒了。这门课多少钱？ A：标准费用是85英镑，但我们有学生优惠，优惠后是65英镑。 B：太好了，我有有效的学生证，所以65英镑非常合适。我可以用电话号码登记吗？号码是07700 900342。 A：我重复一遍：07700 900342。记下了。另外请记住你需要带一个三脚架。我们提供专业镜头等其他设备，但每个人都必须自带三脚架。 B：这个我有，没问题。下午会提供食物吗？ A：因为是下午的课程，所以不包含午餐，但我们确实提供免费的小吃。你可以选择水果拼盘或者一片巧克力蛋糕。 B：绝对选巧克力蛋糕！我无法抗拒它的诱惑。 A：极好的选择。工作坊的集合地点在湖畔咖啡厅（Lakeside Cafe）。千万不要去游客中心，因为那是上午场集合的地方。另外，因为我们要对瀑布进行慢门（长曝光）拍摄，道路会非常湿滑，所以请务必穿上防水靴。而且水边挺冷的，最好穿一件保暖的外套。不过别带雨伞，因为雨伞会碍事，影响相机设备的使用。 B：明了。防水靴和保暖外套。不带雨伞。非常感谢你的帮助，托马斯！

(Shared with Q1.) [Q2] Date of workshop: ________

中文翻译

（与第1题共用）[Q2] 工作坊日期：________

(Shared with Q1.) [Q3] Price: £________

中文翻译

（与第1题共享音频） [Q3] 价格：£________

(Shared with Q1.) [Q4] Contact number: ________

中文翻译

（与第1题共享。）[Q4] 联系电话：________

(Shared with Q1.) [Q5] Essential equipment to bring: a ________

中文翻译

（与第1题共用）[第5题] 必须携带的装备：一个________

(Shared with Q1.) [Q6] What time does the afternoon photography session finish?

中文翻译

（与第1题共用音频。）[Q6] 下午的摄影活动几点结束？

(Shared with Q1.) [Q7] Which complimentary snack does Aisha choose?

中文翻译

（与第1题共用音频。）[第7题] 艾莎选择了哪种免费赠送的点心？

(Shared with Q1.) [Q8] Where will Aisha's photography group meet?

中文翻译

（与第1题共用音频）[Q8] 艾莎的摄影小组将在哪里集合？

(Shared with Q1.) [Q9] What is the main subject Aisha's group will photograph?

中文翻译

（与第1题共用音频。）[Q9] 艾莎（Aisha）的小组要拍摄的主要对象是什么？

(Shared with Q1.) [Q10] Which TWO items of clothing or gear does the booking agent recommend bringing or wearing?

中文翻译

（与第1题共享。）[第10题] 预订代理建议携带或穿着哪两件衣物或装备？

Hello everyone, and welcome back to the newly renovated Marigold Heritage Centre. I’m Amara, the head coordinator here, and I'm absolutely delighted to show you around our fresh new space today. Before we head off, let me give you a quick layout of the building so you don't get lost. Currently, we are standing in the main entrance foyer. As you step through the main entrance doors, the first room you'll see directly on your left, which used to be the old ticket booth, is now our newly designed Information Desk. Please head there to collect your maps and programmes. Now, right in the centre of the building, completely open to the sky, is our stunning Courtyard Garden, which is a lovely spot to sit and relax. If you walk just past the Information Desk, continuing along that left-hand wall towards the back, you'll find our expanded Gift Shop—we originally planned a multimedia room for that space but decided the shop needed more room for local crafts. On the opposite side of the building, occupying the entire long wing on your right-hand side, is the Local History Exhibition. We did think about putting the Children's Play Area there, but we really needed a vast area to display our historic artifacts properly. If you walk straight down the central corridor, passing right by the central garden, you'll reach the very back of the building. We initially planned to put the audio-visual theatre there, but instead, we've installed our brand new Cafeteria. Actually, let me correct myself, the theatre is actually in the quiet room next door to it on the left, but the room directly at the end of that main central corridor is indeed where you can sit down for a warm meal. Now, a bit about our journey... [Q11] Position 1 — the room immediately on your left upon entering

中文翻译

大家好，欢迎回到全新翻修的马里戈尔德历史文化中心。我是这里的总协调员阿马拉，今天非常高兴能带大家参观我们崭新的空间。在出发前，先让我简单介绍一下大楼的布局，以免大家迷路。目前，我们正站在主入口大厅。当您穿过主入口大门时，正左侧看到的第一个房间曾是旧售票处，现在是我们全新设计的咨询台。请前往那里领取您的地图和活动手册。现在，大楼的正中央是一个完全露天的极美庭院花园，这是一个适合坐下放松的好地方。如果您刚走过咨询台，继续沿着左侧的墙壁往后走，就会看到我们扩建后的礼品店——我们最初计划在那个空间建一个多媒体室，但后来决定礼品店需要更大的空间来展示当地手工艺品。在大楼的另一侧，占据您右手边整个长翼的是地方历史展览厅。我们确实考虑过把儿童游乐区设在那里，但我们确实需要一个巨大的区域来妥善展示我们的历史文物。如果您沿着中央走廊直着往前走，穿过中央花园，就会到达大楼的最深处。我们最初计划将视听影院设在那里，但相反，我们现在建成了全新的自助餐厅。事实上，让我纠正一下，视听影院其实在它左边隔壁的安静房间里，但正对中央走廊尽头的那个房间确实是您可以坐下来享用热餐的地方。现在，让我们来了解一下我们的旅程……

(Shared with Q11.) [Q12] Position 2 — the open area in the very centre of the building

中文翻译

（与第11题共用）[Q12] 位置 2 —— 建筑物正中央的开阔区域

(Shared with Q11.) [Q13] Position 3 — the space directly past the Information Desk, along the left-hand wall

中文翻译

（与第11题共用）[Q13] 位置 3——刚过咨询台、沿着左侧墙壁的空间

(Shared with Q11.) [Q14] Position 4 — the entire long wing on the right-hand side of the building

中文翻译

（与第11题共用音频。）[第14题] 位置 4 —— 建筑物右侧的整个长翼

(Shared with Q11.) [Q15] Position 5 — the room situated directly at the far end of the central corridor

中文翻译

（与第11题共用音频。）[Q15] 位置5 —— 位于中央走廊正尽头的房间

(Shared with Q11.) [Q16] What was the main purpose of the recent six-month closure?

中文翻译

（与第11题共用。）[第16题] 最近这次为期六个月的关闭，其主要目的是什么？

(Shared with Q11.) [Q17] What is required of participants in the new volunteering scheme?

中文翻译

（与第11题共享音频）[第17题] 新的志愿服务计划对参与者有什么要求？

(Shared with Q11.) [Q18] What makes the upcoming 'Living History' workshops distinctive?

中文翻译

（与第11题共用）[第18题] 即将举办的“活历史”工作坊有什么独特之处？

(Shared with Q11.) [Q19] When is the outdoor sculpture trail now expected to open?

中文翻译

（与第11题共用音频。）[Q19] 户外雕塑步道目前预计何时开放？

(Shared with Q11.) [Q20] Which TWO activities can children do at the heritage centre today?

中文翻译

（与第11题共用音频。）[第20题] 今天孩子们在历史文化中心可以参加哪两项活动？

A: Welcome, Aisha, Lukas. Today we're reviewing the five core readings on research methods for your sociology project. Let's start with Patel's paper. How did you find it? B: Well, Dr. Ingrid, I initially thought it was going to be about ethical reviews because of the introductory chapter, but actually, it turned out to be an incredibly practical guide on how to design survey questionnaires. It really cleared up how we should phrase our open-ended questions. C: Yeah, I agree with Aisha. I thought it might help us select sample sizes, but the questionnaire design section was definitely its strongest point. We should definitely use it for that. A: Excellent. What about Gomez's study? Lukas? C: Gomez was quite dense. It had a long section on historical literature, which didn't feel very relevant to our modern project. But then it had these amazing case studies showing how to analyze qualitative interviews—you know, coding the transcripts and finding key themes. That's what I got out of it. B: Absolutely. I was struggling with how we'd handle our interview transcripts, and Gomez made the analytical process so clear. Let's definitely earmark that for qualitative interview analysis. A: Good. Now, Nguyen's chapter. That one is often a student favorite. B: Oh, it's brilliant for understanding data visualization. It has all these charts showing how to represent complex statistics visually. Lukas, didn't you think it was more about sampling? C: Well, there's a brief mention of sample sizes at the end, but yes, the core value is definitely how to present statistical data visually. The diagrams were so clear. So, yes, visualization is the main takeaway. A: Right. Moving on to Smith's article. Aisha, did you find that useful? B: To be honest, I got a bit lost. It covers a lot of ground—questionnaires, interviews... but then, wait, actually, they have a whole section dedicated to the ethical reviews process, which is mandatory for our university approval. I initially thought it was just general advice, but it really drills down into getting ethical clearance. C: Actually, Aisha, I think you're confusing Smith with O'Connor's report. Smith's article is the one that really focuses on selecting sample sizes mathematically. It had all those formulas for how many participants we need. The ethical part in Smith was just a minor appendix. B: Oh, silly me! You're totally right, Lukas. Smith is the math-heavy one about sample sizes. I got them mixed up because they both have blue covers. Yes, Smith is for sample sizes. A: And that leaves O'Connor's report. C: Right, so O'Connor must be the one Aisha was thinking of. It really focuses on the ethical side, doesn't it? B: Yes, sorry about that earlier. O'Connor's report is crucial for conducting ethical reviews. It details all the consent forms and participant protection guidelines we need to submit to the academic board. A: Excellent. Now that we've mapped those out, let's talk about your project timeline. You have the draft proposal due next Friday. How are you progressing with the primary data collection planning? C: We wanted to start interviewing local business owners next week, but we realized we need to finalize our pilot study first. We had originally planned to do a pilot with five people, but our tutor—oh, sorry Dr. Ingrid, you suggested three would be enough to test the questions. So we're doing a three-person pilot this Thursday instead. B: Yes, and once the pilot is done, we need to gather our secondary sources. I was going to use the university's digital archive, but it's offline for maintenance all of next week. So we've decided to head over to the city library's physical archives instead, even though it's a bit of a trek. Lukas thought about buying the digital databases online, but that's way too expensive. A: Good choice. A physical archive can be very rewarding. Now, what about your main theoretical framework? Are you sticking with the post-structuralist approach we discussed last month? C: We actually shifted away from that. We briefly flirted with critical theory because it's very popular right now, but after reading more deeply, we realized a constructivist framework aligns much better with our research questions on community identity. It allows us to focus on how participants construct meaning. A: A constructivist framework is perfect for community identity. Just make sure you don't overcomplicate the analysis. What are your thoughts on how to present the final findings? The department offers two options: a traditional written report or a poster presentation accompanied by a short talk. B: Well, we initially wanted to do the poster because it sounded easier, but we found out the poster session is open to the public, which makes me incredibly nervous! Lukas suggested we write the traditional report instead, and actually, I think that's a safer bet for us to get a high grade, even if it's longer. C: I agree. Although a poster would let us practice our public speaking, the written report lets us explain our methodology in much greater detail, which is our strength. So we've officially registered for the written report option. A: That sounds like a wise decision. Now, before our time is up, what are the next steps you need to complete before you submit the draft proposal next week? B: Well, we definitely need to get our supervisor's signature on the ethics form—though we can't do that until we draft the participant consent letter. That's a priority for tomorrow morning. And Lukas, you were going to email the business owners to request their participation, right? C: Yes, I'll send those recruitment emails out tomorrow. I was going to update our literature review section too, but since we decided to change our theoretical framework, we have to rewrite that entire section first, which will have to wait until the weekend. Oh, and we also need to print out the final draft for your review, Dr. Ingrid. A: Actually, please don't print anything. Just email me the digital copy. It saves paper! But do make sure you have formatted your bibliography correctly according to the department style guide. B: Right, no printing then. We'll make sure to double-check the bibliography formatting before we upload it. [Q21] Patel's paper

中文翻译

A: 欢迎你们，Aisha，Lukas。今天我们要复习一下用于你们社会学项目的五篇核心研究方法文献。我们先从 Patel 的论文开始。你们觉得怎么样？ B: 嗯，Ingrid 博士，因为前言章节的缘故，我起初以为它是关于伦理审查的，但实际上，它是一本非常实用的调查问卷设计指南。它确实帮我们理清了应该如何设计我们的开放式问题。 C: 是的，我同意 Aisha 的看法。我原本以为它能帮我们选择样本量，但问卷设计部分绝对是它最出彩的地方。我们一定要把它用在这方面。 A: 很好。那 Gomez 的研究呢？Lukas？ C: Gomez 的那篇内容挺晦涩的。它有一大段关于历史文献的内容，感觉和我们现代的项目没什么关系。但接着它有一些非常棒的案例分析，展示了如何分析定性访谈——比如对转录文本进行编码并找出核心主题。这就是我的收获。 B: 没错。我之前还在纠结怎么处理我们的访谈转录文本，Gomez 把分析过程讲得太透彻了。我们一定要把这篇专门留作定性访谈分析之用。 A: 很好。接下来是 Nguyen 的章节。这一章通常很受学生欢迎。 B: 噢，它在理解数据可视化方面棒极了。里面有很多图表，展示了如何直观地呈现复杂的统计数据。Lukas，你之前不是觉得它更多是关于抽样的吗？ C: 额，最后确实简单提到了样本量，但没错，它的核心价值绝对在于如何直观地呈现统计数据。那些图表非常清晰。所以，是的，可视化是最大的收获。 A: 好的。接下来看 Smith 的文章。Aisha，你觉得那篇有用吗？ B: 说实话，我有点看糊涂了。它涵盖了太多内容——问卷、访谈……但是，等等，其实他们有一整节是专门讲伦理审查流程的，这是我们学校审批所必需的。我起初以为这只是普通建议，但它确实深入探讨了如何获得伦理准入。 C: 实际上，Aisha，我觉得你把 Smith 的文章和 O'Connor 的报告搞混了。Smith 的文章才是真正侧重于用数学方法选择样本量的。里面有很多计算我们需要多少参与者的公式。Smith 里面关于伦理的部分只是一个很小的附录。 B: 哎呀，我真糊涂！你完全说对了，Lukas。Smith 是那篇计算样本量的、全是数学公式的文章。I 把它搞混是因为它们都是蓝色封面。是的，Smith 是关于选择样本量的。 A: 那就剩下 O'Connor 的报告了。 C: 对，那 O'Connor 肯定是 Aisha 刚才想到的那一篇。它真的很侧重于伦理方面，对吧？ B: 是的，刚才真抱歉。O'Connor 的报告对于进行伦理审查至关重要。它详细介绍了我们需要提交给学术委员会的所有知情同意书和参与者保护指南。 A: 棒极了。既然我们已经理清了这些文献，那来谈谈你们的项目时间表吧。你们下周五要交提案初稿。你们初级数据收集计划进展得怎么样了？ C: 我们本想下周开始采访当地企业主，但我们意识到我们得先完成试调查。我们原计划对五个人进行试调查，但我们的导师——噢，抱歉，Ingrid 博士，是您建议三个人就足够测试这些问题了。所以我们这周四要进行一个三个人的试调查。 B: 是的，一旦试调查完成，我们就需要收集二手资料。我原本打算使用学校的数字档案馆，但下周一整周它都因维护而下线。所以我们决定去市图书馆的物理档案馆，尽管路有点远。Lukas 曾考虑在线购买数字数据库，但那太贵了。 A: 很好的选择。物理档案馆可能会有非常丰厚的收获。那么，你们的主要理论框架呢？你们还在坚持我们上个月讨论的后结构主义方法吗？ C: 我们实际上已经放弃了那个方法。我们曾短暂考虑过批判理论，因为现在它很流行，但在深入阅读后，我们发现建构主义框架更契合我们关于社区认同的研究问题。它让我们能够专注于参与者如何建构意义。 A: 建构主义框架非常适合社区认同。只要确保你们没有把分析过程搞得太复杂就行。对于如何呈现最终的研究结果，你们有什么想法？系里提供了两个选择：传统的书面报告，或者海报展示加简短演讲。 B: 额，我们起初想做海报，因为听起来更容易，但我们发现海报展示环节是对公众开放的，这让我非常紧张！Lukas 建议我们撰写传统的报告，实际上，我认为这对我们拿高分来说是更稳妥的选择，尽管篇幅会更长。 C: 我同意。虽然海报能让我们锻炼公众演讲能力，但书面报告能让我们更详细地阐述我们的方法论，这是我们的强项。所以我们已经正式登记了书面报告选项。 A: 这听起来是个明智的决定。那么，在我们时间到之前，下周提交提案初稿前你们还需要完成哪些步骤？ B: 嗯，我们绝对需要让导师在伦理申请表上签字——不过在我们起草好参与者知情同意书之前，我们还没法做这件事。这是明天早上的首要任务。还有 Lukas，你打算给企业主发邮件邀请他们参与，对吧？ C: 是的，我明天会发出这些招募邮件。我本来还打算更新我们的文献综述部分，但既然我们决定改变理论框架，我们就必须先重写这整个部分，这得等到周末了。噢，我们还需要打印出最终草案供您审阅，Ingrid 博士。 A: 实际上，请不要打印任何东西。只需给我发电子版就行。这能省纸！但一定要确保你们已经按照系里的格式指南正确编排了参考文献。 B: 好的，那就不打印了。我们会在上传之前仔细核对参考文献的格式。

(Shared with Q21.) [Q22] Gomez's study

中文翻译

（与第21题共用）Gomez 的研究

(Shared with Q21.) [Q23] Nguyen's chapter

中文翻译

（与第21题共用。） [第23题] 阮（Nguyen）撰写的章节

(Shared with Q21.) [Q24] Smith's article

中文翻译

（与第21题共用音频。）[第24题] 史密斯的文章

(Shared with Q21.) [Q25] O'Connor's report

中文翻译

（与第21题共用音频。）[第25题] 奥康纳的报告

(Shared with Q21.) [Q26] What is the students' current plan for their pilot study?

中文翻译

（与第21题共用音频。）[第26题] 学生们目前对他们的预研究有什么计划？

(Shared with Q21.) [Q27] How do the students plan to access secondary sources?

中文翻译

（与第21题共用音频。）[第27题] 学生们计划如何获取二手资料？

(Shared with Q21.) [Q28] Which theoretical framework have the students chosen for their project?

中文翻译

（与第21题共用。）[第28题] 学生们为他们的项目选择了哪种理论框架？

(Shared with Q21.) [Q29] Why did the students decide to choose the traditional written report?

中文翻译

（与第21题共享音频。）[第29题] 学生们为什么决定选择传统的书面报告？

(Shared with Q21.) [Q30] Which TWO tasks do the students plan to complete tomorrow?

中文翻译

（与第21题共用听力材料。）[第30题] 学生们计划明天完成哪两项任务？

Good morning, everyone. Today, we're looking at a remarkable botanical adaptation in arid ecosystems: the Vesperis shrub. Now, you might expect desert plants to compete fiercely for water, but the Vesperis actually forms underground root networks, fusing their roots together in a process called grafting. Initially, researchers in 1998 hypothesized this was purely to share moisture during droughts. However, a landmark study led by Sofia in 2012—actually, wait, no, it was 2014, my apologies, the 2012 study was on soil microbes—showed that these connections primarily distribute nitrogen, a vital nutrient. Interestingly, this sharing isn't equal; the parent plants actively redirect nutrients to younger, struggling seedlings rather than healthy adult neighbors. While some botanists worried this network might make the plants more vulnerable to soil pathogens, recent field trials proved the opposite: the grafted system actually transmits early warning chemical signals, allowing distant plants to boost their defenses. To investigate this further, researchers monitored three distinct zones, which they labeled Zone Alpha, Zone Beta, and Zone Gamma. In Zone Alpha, they simulated an insect attack by pruning leaves, and observed an immediate chemical response in neighboring plants. In Zone Beta, they restricted water completely to observe hydraulic redistribution. Finally, in Zone Gamma, they introduced a non-harmful tracer dye to map the precise pathway of nutrient flow. Surprisingly, the dye traveled much faster than anticipated, proving that these networks function as highly active conduits rather than passive filters. [Q31] What was the primary focus of the 2014 study led by Sofia?

中文翻译

大家早上好。今天，我们来探讨干旱生态系统中一种非凡的植物适应机制：Vesperis灌木。大家可能会认为荒漠植物会为了争夺水源而进行激烈竞争，但实际上，Vesperis灌木会在地下形成根系网络，通过一种被称为“根系嫁接”的过程将它们的根部融合在一起。最初，研究人员在1998年假设这纯粹是为了在干旱时期共享水分。然而，由Sofia在2012年——哦，等等，不对，是2014年，抱歉，2012年的研究是关于土壤微生物的——主持的一项具有里程碑意义的研究表明，这些连接主要用于输送氮元素，这是一种至关重要的营养物质。有趣的是，这种共享并不是均等的；母体植物会主动将营养物质重新定向输送给较年轻、处于生存困境中的幼苗，而不是健康的成年邻近植物。虽然一些植物学家担心这种网络可能会使植物更容易受到土壤病原体的侵害，但最近的野外试验得出了相反的结论：这种嫁接系统实际上可以传输预警化学信号，从而使远处的植物能够增强自身的防御能力。为了对此进行深入研究，研究人员对三个不同的区域进行了监测，并将其分别标记为Alpha区、Beta区和Gamma区。在Alpha区，他们通过修剪叶片模拟了昆虫袭击，并观察到邻近植物立即做出了化学反应。在Beta区，他们完全限制了水分供应，以观察水分重分配。最后，在Gamma区，他们引入了一种无害的示踪染料，以绘制出营养物质流动的精确路径。令人惊讶的是，染料的移动速度比预期的要快得多，这证明了这些网络起到了高效活性管道的作用，而不是被动过滤器。

(Shared with Q31.) [Q32] Which plants are the primary recipients of nutrients in the Vesperis network?

中文翻译

（与第31题共享。）[第32题] 在Vesperis网络中，哪些植物是养分的主要接收者？

(Shared with Q31.) [Q33] What did recent field trials show regarding the threat of soil pathogens?

中文翻译

（与第31题共享。）[第33题] 最近的田间试验在土壤病原体的威胁方面显示了什么？

(Shared with Q31.) [Q34] Why did the lecturer correct herself when mentioning the year 2012?

中文翻译

（与第31题共用）[第34题] 为什么主讲人在提到2012年时纠正了自己？

(Shared with Q31.) [Q35] What was the key finding from the experiment using tracer dye?

中文翻译

（与第31题共用。）[第35题] 使用示踪染料的实验有什么关键发现？

(Shared with Q31.) [Q36] Which TWO benefits of root grafting in Vesperis shrubs does the lecturer highlight?

中文翻译

（与第 31 题共用音频。）[第 36 题] 演讲者强调了 Vesperis 灌木根系嫁接的哪两个好处？

(Shared with Q31.) [Q37] Pruning leaves to simulate an attack by insects

中文翻译

（与第31题共享）[Q37] 修剪叶片以模拟昆虫侵害

(Shared with Q31.) [Q38] Restricting the water supply entirely to observe distribution

中文翻译

完全限制供水以观察分布情况

(Shared with Q31.) [Q39] Introducing a harmless dye to map nutrient pathways

中文翻译

（与第31题共用）[第39题] 引入一种无害的染色剂以绘制营养物质的输送路径

(Shared with Q31.) [Q40] Severing the roots of plants to measure signal speed

中文翻译

（与第31题共用）[Q40] 切断植物根部以测量信号传递速度